<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Technology and Dependency on Damien Dye&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/series/technology-and-dependency/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Technology and Dependency on Damien Dye&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/series/technology-and-dependency/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How Technology Became Something You Rent</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/technology-you-rent/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/technology-you-rent/</guid>
      <description>Part 1 of 8. Twenty years back you bought software and the copy was yours. Now you rent it, and the supplier sets the terms. This post walks through how that happened, one step at a time, and why every step made it harder to pack up and go elsewhere. Plain language, short lines.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Renting Your Technology Costs</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/what-renting-costs/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/what-renting-costs/</guid>
      <description>Part 2 of 8. Once moving supplier is hard, the costs change shape. The price follows how hard it is to leave. Profit gets declared somewhere other than where it was earned. The law that applies follows who owns the company, not where the building stands. And a service can stop for reasons that have nowt to do with you. Plain language, with sources.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Pays for the Software You Use</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/who-pays-for-the-software/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/who-pays-for-the-software/</guid>
      <description>Part 3 of 8. The first two posts looked at what dependency costs you; this one at who else foots the bill. Open source was fought for about 15 years, then taken up, and much of it is now kept going by people paid nowt for it. And how the firms that build software get bought, borrowed against and stripped of what other folk built.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What the Record Shows</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/what-the-record-shows/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/what-the-record-shows/</guid>
      <description>Part 4 of 8. Picking a supplier means guessing how they will behave later, and the fairest guess is what courts and regulators have decided. Findings against the largest tech firms, leaning on European decisions and the cases regulators lost, then the pattern: fines small next to the gain, remedies years late, harms known inside long before out.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Far One Country&#39;s Law Reaches</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/how-far-the-law-reaches/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/how-far-the-law-reaches/</guid>
      <description>Part 5 of 8. Part 2 covered the law that reaches your data; this one the law that reaches your company. Non-American firms paying huge penalties under US law for conduct barely connected to America, what the French National Assembly made of it as a commercial weapon, and the assumptions a product carries from its home market.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backdoors, and Who Gets Accused of Them</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/backdoors-and-who-is-accused/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/backdoors-and-who-is-accused/</guid>
      <description>Part 6 of 8. Barring a supplier on security grounds needs a standard applied evenly. A Swiss inquiry confirmed two intelligence services owned an encryption firm and sold weakened machines to 120&#43; governments; a crypto standard was pulled over a suspected weakness; kit gets intercepted in transit. Then the 2024 event that settled it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Same Pattern in Other Industries</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/the-same-pattern-elsewhere/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/the-same-pattern-elsewhere/</guid>
      <description>Part 7 of 8. This is not really about technology. Four firms control most of the world&amp;#39;s seed supply and licence terms can stop a farmer replanting; ten retailers move most of Britain&amp;#39;s food. Both got a legal answer, a Groceries Code Adjudicator here and an unfair-trading directive across the EU. Software has nowt like it, and this asks why.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where Your Choices Are Coming Back</title>
      <link>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/choice-coming-back/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blogs.damiendye.uk/en/random/choice-coming-back/</guid>
      <description>Part 8 of 8. Since 2025 the European answer has turned from plans into things you can actually install. Office suites, payment systems and new rules are all real now. This post covers what has landed, what is honestly still years off, and 3 questions to work out where you stand. Plain language.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
